Florida v. Jardines, 11-564 from the Supreme Court in March 2013 Research Paper

Florida v. Jardines, 11-564 from the overbearing Court in March 2013 - Research Paper Examplent amount of marijuana and evidence that he was a medicine trafficker too, Jardines contested the warrant saying that it is was breach of the fourth amendment. Hence, rendering the raid, and the consequence (charges for possessing marijuana), null and void.The Supreme Court of Florida approved the decision of the trial flirt, holding that the evidence be suppressed as the officers had commit Fourth Amendment breach. They did not consecrate a probable cause to search Jardines property (Florida v. Jardines, 2013).5. Rationale why did the court decide the case this way? Was there a decent? A concurring spirit? How many Justices voted with the majority? What were the reasons that different judges felt differently about parts of the case?The court is not a law machine practise out to operate under given set of command. The law and courts operate to contribute towards a better society. The l aw is made to protect the citizen and not to kick up them. The notion that no one should be held above the law needs to be practiced in such a way as decided the Supreme Court of Florida. The Fourth amendment upholds that the people allow a right to be secure in their homes (Jardines v. State, 2011).The Fourth Amendment does not allow police or anyone to search someones property without probable cause. The term search has been highlighted in the Fourth Amendment as when governments physically intrudes someones property (person, papers, houses or effects) it is a search (Florida v. Jardines, 2013).. The citizens should consider home as safe from unreasonable investigations. If this sense of security is not provided to the citizens then the society will always olfaction vulnerable and under pressure of the government.The officers that searched Jardines house did not see anything with their own eyes before enter his premises. There was apparently no suspicious activity around or in his house. Had the officers seen something then it would have been a reasonable