Theory of Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Theory of Knowledge - Essay ExampleThis, therefore, leads to justification of our beliefs. Justification is established by the feature between believing that something is received and between knowing that something is what it is. For instance, for a belief to be justified, it has to be residueorsed by some other idea so that it can be dependable or relied upon. More so, the purpose supporting it must be believed to be true and lastly, it is satisfying that we keep back a substantive or credible and viable reason for us to believe that the idea endorsing our belief is actually real. When all these ideas argon put together, it constitutes true and credible knowledge. Additionally, it is important that our knowledge that we acquire be true or real. right is the capability of the information acquired being consistent with evident presented and truths closely it. Thus, all information is believed to be true and it is known to be true, which in turn makes up credible, reliable know ledge. Rationality is the ability to act exploitation reason in relation to the facts of reality of certain scenario or situation (Allen 31). Thus, if one is having false knowledge, they argon not in a position to act rationally but on the other hand, if they suck up true and credible knowledge, they will be in a position to act or play rationally. It is vital to note that it is possible for people to act reasonably or rationality with bring out their knowledge since they posses ill-timed knowledge. The only way to avoid much(prenominal) kind of situation is that individuals need to reason cautiously around any scenario before they act on it. Immanuel Kant formulated his principles regarding what is right and wrong. He developed a dust of three questions he referred to as formulations which an individual need to ask before undertaking any march in order to decide upon ethicality of the action. It is significant for a person to ask himself if the action they are about to part ake corresponds to a rule, which should be used universally. It is good to view other people as our end objective rather than the means to gain personal goals. For Kant, the driving force is a determining cistron to what extent can an action be regarded as ethical. This driving force is known as motive. Kants objective morality can be well understood from a more precise philosophical vocabulary (Allen 36-7). Although, it is natural that everything in the universe acts in accordance with the law, Kant argues that only rational beings in faithfulness and respect to the objective principle influenced by practical reason can influence their actions. Human beings have got subjective impulses such as desires and inclinations that may contradict how they reason. According to Kant, human beings hold a significant place in creation and morality can be said to be ultimate command of imperative or reason. For instance, objective principle includes acting in accordance with the law and ignor ing other agents such as inclinations and desires in making moral judgments. Moral action is not justified if it is done out